TINY vs. FSELX
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while FSELX is a Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 24.31%/yr vs 50.94%/yr for FSELX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.
Performance
TINY vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 43.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 48.22% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -11.41%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- YTD
- 43.61%
- 1Y
- 79.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.00%
FSELX
- 1D
- 7.17%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- 6M
- 32.88%
- YTD
- 48.22%
- 1Y
- 83.24%
- 3Y*
- 50.94%
- 5Y*
- 38.34%
- 10Y*
- 35.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $683.29K | $1.59M | $1.37M |
TINY vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 43.61% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.60% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 48.22% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 20.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and FSELX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TINY and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
FSELX
TINY vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINY | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.90 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 12.21 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINY vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -82.54% | +38.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.86% | -26.87% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -36.31% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.24% | -21.63% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -28.63% | +12.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | 6.37% | +0.40% |
Volatility
TINY vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) have volatilities of 17.53% and 16.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.53% | 16.75% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.68% | 34.43% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.15% | 40.79% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 40.42% | -6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 35.84% | -2.31% |
TINY vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FSELX's 11.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 11.05% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.19% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and FSELX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to FSELX (16.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer