TINY vs. FTWO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TINY returned 128.45% vs 26.68% for FTWO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

TINY vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 77.76% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 9.20% return.

TINY

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 17.94%
• YTD: 77.76%
• 6M: 77.75%
• 1Y: 128.45%
• 3Y*: 35.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTWO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 26.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	77.76%	19.98%	6.63%	9.62%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	9.20%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and FTWO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.49

TINY vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	FTWO
Technology	70.5%	-
Healthcare	10.4%	-
Basic Materials	9.8%	26.8%
Industrials	4.8%	33.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	1.1%
Energy	-	27.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	11.2%

Return for Risk

TINY vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 93
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 38
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINY	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	1.44	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	1.98	+2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.25	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.71	1.84	+5.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.08	5.40	+21.68

TINY vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINY vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-18.17%	-25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-14.55%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.58%	+10.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.00%	-3.56%	-12.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	4.95%	-0.19%

Volatility

TINY vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 6.14%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.12%	6.14%	+4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.73%	15.04%	+12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.95%	18.70%	+15.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.57%	19.31%	+13.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.57%	19.31%	+13.26%

TINY vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than FTWO's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.16%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and FTWO in my portfolio?

TINY and FTWO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or FTWO?

TINY has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to FTWO (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 128.45% vs 26.68% for FTWO. On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 128.45% return vs 26.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or FTWO?

FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or FTWO?

FTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.16% for TINY.

What is the main difference between TINY and FTWO?

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTWO is Energy Equities. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.