PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGS vs. EMBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TAGS vs. EMBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TAGS vs. EMBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
8.51%-8.76%-14.57%-6.11%16.25%27.05%27.21%
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
-1.32%12.55%6.76%10.60%-13.84%-1.84%11.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than EMBD's -1.32% return.


TAGS

1D
-1.93%
1M
5.01%
YTD
8.51%
6M
6.56%
1Y
-3.00%
3Y*
-7.12%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
-0.63%

EMBD

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
1.55%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAGS vs. EMBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TAGS vs. EMBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBD
EMBD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EMBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGS vs. EMBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGSEMBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

1.31

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.30

1.83

-2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.24

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

2.07

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.19

8.35

-8.54

TAGS vs. EMBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the EMBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGS and EMBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGSEMBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

1.31

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.31

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.42

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between TAGS and EMBD is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TAGS vs. EMBD - Dividend Comparison

TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.77%5.48%5.83%5.29%4.53%4.99%3.34%

Drawdowns

TAGS vs. EMBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than EMBD's maximum drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and EMBD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGSEMBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-24.27%

-52.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-4.23%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-24.27%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-3.04%

-59.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.16%

-6.02%

-51.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

1.05%

+6.54%

Volatility

TAGS vs. EMBD - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) at 2.58%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TAGSEMBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

2.58%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

4.28%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

6.51%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

9.14%

+7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

8.96%

+9.39%