TAGS vs. FTAG
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while FTAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TAGS returned -1.88%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for FTAG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.
Performance
TAGS vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed FTAG with an annualized return of -1.88%, while FTAG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.38% annualized return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -4.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
FTAG
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 8.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
TAGS vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.23% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 6.79% | 14.82% | -6.72% | -7.28% | -4.52% | 17.31% | 13.88% | 9.05% | -19.46% | 24.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and FTAG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.11 |
The correlation between TAGS and FTAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
FTAG
TAGS vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.11 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.89 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 2.04 | -2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and FTAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -90.89% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.56% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | -21.87% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -32.77% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | -50.79% | +6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -79.35% | +14.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -71.25% | +14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 4.15% | +1.09% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 3.29%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.95% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 10.93% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 14.17% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 17.41% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 19.60% | -1.60% |
TAGS vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.42% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and FTAG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTAG has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to TAGS (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs FTAG's -90.89%.
On 10-year performance, FTAG leads with 5.38% vs -1.88% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTAG has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FTAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and FTAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer