TAGS vs. SOYB
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - TAGS tracks the Teucrium TAGS Index while SOYB tracks the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TAGS returned -0.46%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for SOYB. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for SOYB.
Performance
TAGS vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than SOYB's 15.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed SOYB with an annualized return of -0.46%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.22% annualized return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- -7.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- -0.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.75%
SOYB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.57M | $2.15M | $2.74M | |
| $388.58K | $387.70K | $588.98K |
TAGS vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 7.86% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 15.10% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -9.51% | -6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and SOYB is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, TAGS and SOYB have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
SOYB
TAGS vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.13 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 5.60 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and SOYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -53.76% | -22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -8.78% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -30.61% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -31.01% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.51% | -33.93% | -8.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.09% | -14.16% | -48.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.28% | -25.64% | -31.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 3.33% | +0.48% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.47% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 10.13% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 13.37% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.12% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 16.70% | +1.28% |
TAGS vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAGS nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and SOYB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SOYB (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs SOYB's -53.76%.
On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 3.22% vs -0.46% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 3.22% return vs -0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
TAGS and SOYB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 1.88% for SOYB.
SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and SOYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer