TAGS vs. DBA
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds - TAGS tracks the Teucrium TAGS Index while DBA tracks the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TAGS returned -1.83%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DBA. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for DBA.
Performance
TAGS vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed DBA with an annualized return of -1.83%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively higher 3.67% annualized return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -4.97%
- 3Y*
- -10.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- -1.83%
DBA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
TAGS vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.75% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 4.43% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and DBA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.45 |
The correlation between TAGS and DBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
DBA
TAGS vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.08 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.53 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 1.15 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and DBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -67.97% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -8.67% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | -12.36% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -15.94% | -21.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | -39.12% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.50% | -26.48% | -38.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -41.06% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 3.96% | +2.03% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 2.85%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.85% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 6.65% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 10.60% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 13.93% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 13.06% | +4.94% |
TAGS vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.42% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and DBA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to DBA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs DBA's -67.97%.
On 10-year performance, DBA leads with 3.67% vs -1.83% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBA has performed better with a 3.67% return vs -1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for DBA.
DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.88% for DBA.
DBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and DBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer