SSUS vs. PFM
SSUS (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SSUS is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSUS returned 11.91%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSUS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
SSUS vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
PFM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
SSUS vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 14.61% | 16.47% | 18.86% | 18.19% | -17.64% | 28.02% | 17.44% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 8.18% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and PFM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SSUS and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSUS vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSUS
PFM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
SSUS
PFM
Communication Services
SSUS
PFM
Consumer Cyclical
SSUS
PFM
Industrials
SSUS
PFM
Financial Services
SSUS
PFM
Healthcare
SSUS
PFM
Real Estate
SSUS
PFM
Utilities
SSUS
PFM
Energy
SSUS
PFM
Consumer Defensive
SSUS
PFM
Basic Materials
SSUS
PFM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
PFM
SSUS vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSUS | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 2.09 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 3.07 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.78 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | 11.28 | +4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSUS | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.09 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.53 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and PFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -53.21% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -7.09% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -14.50% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -17.81% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.23% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -6.94% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility
SSUS vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that SSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 2.04% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 7.13% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 9.47% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 13.54% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.21% | +1.65% |
SSUS vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSUS vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSUS and PFM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSUS has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs PFM's -53.21%.
On 5-year performance, SSUS leads with 11.91% vs 10.63% for PFM. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSUS has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.45% for SSUS.
They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.53% for PFM.
SSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSUS and PFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer