PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PFM vs. VBMFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PFMVBMFX
YTD Return20.12%1.27%
1Y Return29.65%7.71%
3Y Return (Ann)8.85%-2.51%
5Y Return (Ann)11.87%-0.40%
10Y Return (Ann)10.51%1.25%
Sharpe Ratio3.041.33
Sortino Ratio4.231.98
Omega Ratio1.561.24
Calmar Ratio6.030.48
Martin Ratio20.524.59
Ulcer Index1.44%1.68%
Daily Std Dev9.71%5.78%
Max Drawdown-53.21%-19.21%
Current Drawdown-0.53%-9.66%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.2

The correlation between PFM and VBMFX is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

PFM vs. VBMFX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PFM achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than VBMFX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PFM has outperformed VBMFX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while VBMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.25% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.23%
2.34%
PFM
VBMFX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFM vs. VBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VBMFX's 0.15% expense ratio.


PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
Expense ratio chart for PFM: current value at 0.53% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.53%
Expense ratio chart for VBMFX: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFM vs. VBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PFM, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PFM, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PFM, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PFM, currently valued at 6.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PFM, currently valued at 20.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.52
VBMFX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VBMFX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VBMFX, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VBMFX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VBMFX, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VBMFX, currently valued at 4.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.59

PFM vs. VBMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFM Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the VBMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFM and VBMFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.04
1.33
PFM
VBMFX

Dividends

PFM vs. VBMFX - Dividend Comparison

PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than VBMFX's 3.48% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
1.58%1.86%1.95%1.69%1.92%1.94%2.27%1.70%2.56%2.36%1.93%1.87%
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
3.48%3.00%2.42%1.81%2.14%2.64%2.67%2.43%2.38%2.38%2.43%2.43%

Drawdowns

PFM vs. VBMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, which is greater than VBMFX's maximum drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and VBMFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.53%
-9.66%
PFM
VBMFX

Volatility

PFM vs. VBMFX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that PFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.33%
1.76%
PFM
VBMFX