PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PFM vs. PRF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PFMPRF
YTD Return20.12%20.86%
1Y Return29.65%33.51%
3Y Return (Ann)8.85%9.28%
5Y Return (Ann)11.87%13.66%
10Y Return (Ann)10.51%11.03%
Sharpe Ratio3.042.99
Sortino Ratio4.234.15
Omega Ratio1.561.55
Calmar Ratio6.035.65
Martin Ratio20.5219.90
Ulcer Index1.44%1.67%
Daily Std Dev9.71%11.12%
Max Drawdown-53.21%-60.35%
Current Drawdown-0.53%-0.71%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between PFM and PRF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PFM vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PFM having a 20.12% return and PRF slightly higher at 20.86%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFM having a 10.51% annualized return and PRF not far ahead at 11.03%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.23%
10.08%
PFM
PRF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFM vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.39% expense ratio.


PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
Expense ratio chart for PFM: current value at 0.53% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.53%
Expense ratio chart for PRF: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFM vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PFM, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PFM, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PFM, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PFM, currently valued at 6.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PFM, currently valued at 20.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.52
PRF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRF, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRF, currently valued at 4.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PRF, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRF, currently valued at 5.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PRF, currently valued at 19.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.90

PFM vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFM Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFM and PRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.04
2.99
PFM
PRF

Dividends

PFM vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than PRF's 1.67% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
1.58%1.86%1.95%1.69%1.92%1.94%2.27%1.70%2.56%2.36%1.93%1.87%
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.67%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%1.73%1.56%

Drawdowns

PFM vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and PRF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.53%
-0.71%
PFM
PRF

Volatility

PFM vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) is 3.33%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that PFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.33%
3.98%
PFM
PRF