PFM vs. EDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV).
PFM and EDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005. EDIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. Both PFM and EDIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFM or EDIV.
Key characteristics
| PFM | EDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.76% | 14.43% |
| 1Y Return | 31.76% | 26.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.09% | 11.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.04% | 7.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.55% | 4.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.14 | 2.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.37 | 2.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.58 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.28 | 2.85 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.42 | 11.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.44% | 2.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.80% | 12.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.21% | -53.36% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFM and EDIV is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PFM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PFM achieves a 20.76% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 14.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PFM has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 10.55%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EDIV's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 1.93% | 1.87% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 3.54% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.93% | 5.33% | 4.84% | 5.13% |
Drawdowns
PFM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and EDIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) is 3.44%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that PFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.