SSUS vs. CRDBX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX).

SSUS is an actively managed fund by Donald L. Hagan LLC. It was launched on Jan 17, 2020. CRDBX is managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020.

Performance

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF	-4.23%	16.47%	18.86%	18.19%	-17.64%	28.02%	22.02%
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund	-2.90%	25.36%	19.91%	18.44%	-8.22%	28.08%	24.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's -2.90% return.

SSUS

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: -4.23%
• 6M: -2.87%
• 1Y: 15.26%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: —

CRDBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: -2.90%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: 30.41%
• 3Y*: 13.23%
• 5Y*: 11.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.

CRDBX

Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund

SSUS

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF

Return for Risk

SSUS vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSUS

SSUS Risk / Return Rank: 52
SSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CRDBX

CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 92
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSUS	CRDBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.50	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	2.79	-1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.52	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	4.28	-2.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	13.76	-7.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSUS and CRDBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSUS	CRDBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.50	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.01	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.01	+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between SSUS and CRDBX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than CRDBX's 15.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF	0.54%	0.52%	0.68%	1.07%	0.63%	0.55%	0.50%
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund	15.82%	15.36%	12.58%	9.91%	0.18%	25.05%	1.65%

Drawdowns

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and CRDBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSUS	CRDBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.75%	-97.00%	+73.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.83%	-7.13%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	-97.00%	+73.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.35%	-95.91%	+89.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-25.62%	+20.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.22%	+0.33%

Volatility

SSUS vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) at 2.03%. This indicates that SSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSUS	CRDBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	2.03%	+3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.61%	9.57%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.93%	20.50%	-2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	1,635.86%	-1,620.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	1,526.35%	-1,509.39%