SSUS vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
SSUS and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSUS is an actively managed fund by Donald L. Hagan LLC. It was launched on Jan 17, 2020. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005.
Performance
SSUS vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSUS vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | -4.23% | 16.47% | 18.86% | 18.19% | -17.64% | 28.02% | 17.44% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.82% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 19.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.82% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSUS vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
XLG
SSUS vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSUS | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.97 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.52 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.60 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 5.67 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSUS | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.97 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.74 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.58 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and XLG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSUS vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.54% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -52.39% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -12.41% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -28.02% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -9.56% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -7.69% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.49% | -0.94% |
Volatility
SSUS vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 5.76% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 10.64% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 19.97% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 18.69% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 18.81% | -1.85% |