PFM vs. PHO
PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFM returned 11.66%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for PHO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFM charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.
Performance
PFM vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFM achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -5.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFM having a 11.66% annualized return and PHO not far behind at 11.35%.
PFM
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
PHO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- -3.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
PFM vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 7.32% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 9.53% | 26.88% | -4.58% | 17.65% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.56% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFM and PHO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PFM and PHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PFM vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFM
PHO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
PFM
PHO
Financial Services
PFM
PHO
Healthcare
PFM
PHO
Industrials
PFM
PHO
Consumer Defensive
PFM
PHO
-
Energy
PFM
PHO
-
Utilities
PFM
PHO
Consumer Cyclical
PFM
PHO
-
Basic Materials
PFM
PHO
Real Estate
PFM
PHO
-
Communication Services
PFM
PHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFM vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
PFM
PHO
PFM vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.97 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | -0.27 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | -0.68 | +11.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | -0.25 | +2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.28 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.59 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.34 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PFM vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, roughly equal to the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.21% | -55.62% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -13.78% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.50% | -19.19% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.81% | -28.60% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.22% | -34.92% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -10.77% | +9.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -10.18% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 5.40% | -3.65% |
Volatility
PFM vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) is 2.30%, while Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that PFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 3.60% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 10.91% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 14.76% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 18.35% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 19.45% | -4.24% |
PFM vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFM vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than PHO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.34% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFM and PHO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PFM (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFM dropped -53.21% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, PFM leads with 11.66% vs 11.35% for PHO. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PFM has performed better with a 11.66% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.
PFM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PHO is Water Equities. PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PFM and 0.60% for PHO.
PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFM and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer