PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSUS vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSUS vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's 10.04% return.


SSUS

1D
-1.69%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.31%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*

DYNF

1D
-1.62%
1M
0.13%
YTD
10.04%
6M
8.91%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
25.19%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSUS vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
11.37%16.47%18.86%18.19%-17.64%28.02%17.55%
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
10.04%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SSUS and DYNF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.95

The correlation between SSUS and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSUS vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSUS
DYNF

Technology

49.0%
40.5%

Communication Services

16.2%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
7.0%

Financial Services

5.0%
14.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.8%

Industrials

4.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Utilities

3.3%
2.8%

Energy

2.5%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.8%

Technology

SSUS
49.0%
DYNF
40.5%

Communication Services

SSUS
16.2%
DYNF
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SSUS
9.7%
DYNF
7.0%

Financial Services

SSUS
5.0%
DYNF
14.9%

Healthcare

SSUS
4.2%
DYNF
5.8%

Industrials

SSUS
4.0%
DYNF
9.5%

Real Estate

SSUS
3.5%
DYNF
1.9%

Utilities

SSUS
3.3%
DYNF
2.8%

Energy

SSUS
2.5%
DYNF
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

SSUS
2.2%
DYNF
1.7%

Basic Materials

SSUS
0.5%
DYNF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSUS vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSUS
SSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSUS vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSUSDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.18

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

14.86

-2.77

SSUS vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSUS and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSUS vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSUSDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-34.72%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-8.67%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-18.70%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-28.65%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-1.97%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-5.94%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.85%

+0.22%

Volatility

SSUS vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) at 5.38%. This indicates that SSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSUSDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.38%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

10.64%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

13.24%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

17.62%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

19.91%

-2.98%

SSUS vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSUS vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than DYNF's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
0.81%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
0.46%0.52%0.68%1.07%0.63%0.55%0.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SSUS and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSUS has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to DYNF (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.71% vs 11.07% for SSUS. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.46% for SSUS.

SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.26% for DYNF.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSUS and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer