SSUS vs. SCHG
SSUS (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SSUS is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSUS returned 11.91%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSUS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SSUS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
SSUS vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 14.61% | 16.47% | 18.86% | 18.19% | -17.64% | 28.02% | 17.44% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.42% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 32.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and SCHG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SSUS and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSUS vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSUS
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
SSUS
SCHG
Communication Services
SSUS
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SSUS
SCHG
Industrials
SSUS
SCHG
Financial Services
SSUS
SCHG
Healthcare
SSUS
SCHG
Real Estate
SSUS
SCHG
Utilities
SSUS
SCHG
Energy
SSUS
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SSUS
SCHG
Basic Materials
SSUS
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
SCHG
SSUS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSUS | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 1.60 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 2.18 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 1.51 | +1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | 5.04 | +10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSUS | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.60 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -34.59% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -16.41% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -23.39% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -34.59% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -1.78% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -5.20% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 4.90% | -2.96% |
Volatility
SSUS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 3.61% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 11.62% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 15.50% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 22.27% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 21.55% | -4.69% |
SSUS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSUS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SSUS and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SSUS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 15.59% vs 11.91% for SSUS. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SSUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 15.59% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.
SSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.04% for SCHG.
SSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSUS and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer