SPYG vs. IVW
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 18.20%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for IVW. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IVW.
Performance
SPYG vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYG having a 13.75% return and IVW slightly lower at 13.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYG having a 18.20% annualized return and IVW not far behind at 18.07%.
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
IVW
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
SPYG vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.68% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and IVW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPYG and IVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. IVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
IVW
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
IVW
Communication Services
SPYG
IVW
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
IVW
Financial Services
SPYG
IVW
Healthcare
SPYG
IVW
Industrials
SPYG
IVW
Utilities
SPYG
IVW
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
IVW
Real Estate
SPYG
IVW
Basic Materials
SPYG
IVW
Energy
SPYG
IVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
IVW
SPYG vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.47 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 10.19 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.76 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.45 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than IVW's maximum drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and IVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -57.33% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -13.75% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -22.15% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -32.72% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -32.72% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.12% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -17.62% | -6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.32% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.30% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 12.37% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 15.87% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 21.16% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 20.62% | +0.02% |
SPYG vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYG vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than IVW's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SPYG and IVW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVW (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs IVW's -57.33%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 18.07% for IVW. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while IVW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Both ETFs track S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.18% for IVW.
IVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and IVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer