IVW vs. QQQ
IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVW returned 18.21%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
IVW vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 18.21%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
IVW
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- 18.21%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
IVW vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.26% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and QQQ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IVW and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVW vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVW
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IVW
QQQ
Communication Services
IVW
QQQ
Financial Services
IVW
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IVW
QQQ
Healthcare
IVW
QQQ
Industrials
IVW
QQQ
Utilities
IVW
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IVW
QQQ
Real Estate
IVW
QQQ
Basic Materials
IVW
QQQ
Energy
IVW
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVW vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IVW
QQQ
IVW vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.44 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 12.79 | -3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVW vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -82.97% | +25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -11.96% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.15% | -22.77% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -35.12% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -35.12% | +2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.99% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.59% | -32.73% | +15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.21% | +0.23% |
Volatility
IVW vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is 6.84%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that IVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 8.47% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 14.20% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 17.67% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 22.64% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 22.43% | -1.72% |
IVW vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVW and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVW vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IVW and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to IVW (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 18.21% for IVW. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, IVW has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 18.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVW and QQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.36% for IVW.
IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVW and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer