IVW vs. VUG
IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IVW tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVW returned 18.18%/yr vs 18.40%/yr for VUG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
IVW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 10.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVW having a 18.18% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 18.40%.
IVW
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 18.18%
VUG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
IVW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 14.80% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 10.86% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and VUG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IVW and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVW
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IVW
VUG
Communication Services
IVW
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
IVW
VUG
Financial Services
IVW
VUG
Industrials
IVW
VUG
Healthcare
IVW
VUG
Consumer Defensive
IVW
VUG
Real Estate
IVW
VUG
Utilities
IVW
VUG
Basic Materials
IVW
VUG
Energy
IVW
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
IVW
VUG
IVW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 1.93 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.05 | 2.60 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.90 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 6.65 | +4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 1.93 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.71 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.86 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IVW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -50.68% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -16.53% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.15% | -22.85% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -35.61% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -35.61% | +2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.28% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -7.09% | -10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.71% | -1.39% |
Volatility
IVW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.52%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.52% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 12.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 15.80% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 22.22% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 21.44% | -0.82% |
IVW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IVW and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVW has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VUG (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.40% vs 18.18% for IVW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.40% return vs 18.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
IVW tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.03% for VUG.
IVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVW and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer