PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVW vs. IVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVW vs. IVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than IVE's 7.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has outperformed IVE with an annualized return of 18.18%, while IVE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.80% annualized return.


IVW

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.27%
YTD
14.80%
6M
14.82%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
16.48%
10Y*
18.18%

IVE

1D
0.51%
1M
1.95%
YTD
7.84%
6M
8.67%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVW vs. IVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.80%21.95%35.82%29.83%-29.50%31.80%33.19%30.77%-0.21%27.21%
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
7.84%13.02%12.03%22.07%-5.41%24.72%1.22%31.62%-9.22%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IVW and IVE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between IVW and IVE has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IVW vs. IVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVW
IVE

Technology

49.3%
19.6%

Communication Services

18.0%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
11.0%

Financial Services

8.9%
15.2%

Industrials

6.2%
10.7%

Healthcare

5.8%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

0.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.4%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.4%
3.4%

Energy

0.1%
7.6%

Technology

IVW
49.3%
IVE
19.6%

Communication Services

IVW
18.0%
IVE
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVW
9.4%
IVE
11.0%

Financial Services

IVW
8.9%
IVE
15.2%

Industrials

IVW
6.2%
IVE
10.7%

Healthcare

IVW
5.8%
IVE
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVW
1.0%
IVE
9.5%

Real Estate

IVW
0.6%
IVE
3.5%

Utilities

IVW
0.4%
IVE
4.6%

Basic Materials

IVW
0.4%
IVE
3.4%

Energy

IVW
0.1%
IVE
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVW vs. IVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IVE
IVE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVW vs. IVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVWIVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.29

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.19

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.65

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.16

13.97

-2.81

IVW vs. IVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the IVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVW and IVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVWIVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.29

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.70

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Drawdowns

IVW vs. IVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, smaller than the maximum IVE drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and IVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVWIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.33%

-61.32%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-6.19%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.15%

-17.58%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-18.04%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-37.04%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.20%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-10.10%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

1.62%

+1.70%

Volatility

IVW vs. IVE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) at 2.09%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVWIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.09%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

7.04%

+5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

9.78%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

14.40%

+6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

16.96%

+3.66%

IVW vs. IVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVW and IVE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVW vs. IVE - Dividend Comparison

IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than IVE's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
1.52%1.61%2.04%1.65%2.10%1.81%2.37%2.11%2.74%2.12%2.26%2.44%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.35%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVW and IVE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVW has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to IVE (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs IVE's -61.32%.

On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.18% vs 11.80% for IVE. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, IVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.18% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVW and IVE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

IVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.

IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVE is Large Cap Value Equities. IVW tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index.

IVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVW and IVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer