IVW vs. VOO
IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVW returned 18.18%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for VOO. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IVW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.18%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.
IVW
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 18.18%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
IVW vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 14.80% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and VOO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IVW and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVW vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVW
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IVW
VOO
Communication Services
IVW
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IVW
VOO
Financial Services
IVW
VOO
Industrials
IVW
VOO
Healthcare
IVW
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IVW
VOO
Real Estate
IVW
VOO
Utilities
IVW
VOO
Basic Materials
IVW
VOO
Energy
IVW
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVW vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IVW
VOO
IVW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.53 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.05 | 3.43 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.42 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 15.95 | -4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.53 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.85 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.87 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.89 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
IVW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -33.99% | -23.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -8.90% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.15% | -18.69% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -24.52% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -33.99% | +1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -3.69% | -13.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 1.91% | +1.41% |
Volatility
IVW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVW | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 2.74% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 8.88% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 11.78% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 16.81% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 18.01% | +2.61% |
IVW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IVW and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVW has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.18% vs 15.65% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.18% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IVW tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVW and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer