PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPXN having a 11.33% return and NOBL slightly lower at 11.29%. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 15.44%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.


SPXN

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.48%
6M
9.55%
YTD
11.33%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
15.44%

NOBL

1D
2.38%
1M
3.24%
6M
5.51%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
11.33%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
11.29%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and NOBL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between SPXN and NOBL has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPXN vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
NOBL

Technology

43.4%
4.6%

Communication Services

11.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
5.3%

Healthcare

10.7%
10.2%

Industrials

9.2%
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
23.6%

Utilities

3.1%
5.7%

Energy

2.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

2.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

-

12.8%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Technology

SPXN
43.4%
NOBL
4.6%

Communication Services

SPXN
11.4%
NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.0%
NOBL
5.3%

Healthcare

SPXN
10.7%
NOBL
10.2%

Industrials

SPXN
9.2%
NOBL
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.4%
NOBL
23.6%

Utilities

SPXN
3.1%
NOBL
5.7%

Energy

SPXN
2.5%
NOBL
2.9%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
NOBL
10.2%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

NOBL
12.8%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

NOBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXNNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.64

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

4.15

+6.26

SPXN vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-35.43%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-9.11%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-15.36%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-17.92%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-35.43%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-0.69%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-3.47%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.60%

-1.34%

Volatility

SPXN vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.83%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.72%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

8.85%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

11.82%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

14.47%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.61%

+1.06%

SPXN vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than NOBL's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.03%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.90%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXN and NOBL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBL has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SPXN (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 15.44% vs 9.76% for NOBL. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.90% for SPXN.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while NOBL is Dividend. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.35% for NOBL.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer