SPXN vs. SPXV
SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) and SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from ProShares - SPXN tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index while SPXV tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXN returned 16.32%/yr vs 16.47%/yr for SPXV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
SPXN vs. SPXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than SPXV's 13.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXN having a 16.32% annualized return and SPXV not far ahead at 16.47%.
SPXN
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SPXV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 31.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.80%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
SPXN vs. SPXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 14.25% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 13.22% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 30.71% | -20.47% | 28.37% | 18.99% | 33.58% | -3.81% | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXN and SPXV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SPXN and SPXV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXN vs. SPXV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXN
SPXV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPXN
SPXV
Communication Services
SPXN
SPXV
Consumer Cyclical
SPXN
SPXV
Healthcare
SPXN
SPXV
-
Industrials
SPXN
SPXV
Consumer Defensive
SPXN
SPXV
Energy
SPXN
SPXV
Utilities
SPXN
SPXV
Basic Materials
SPXN
SPXV
Financial Services
SPXN
-
SPXV
Real Estate
SPXN
-
SPXV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXN vs. SPXV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXN
SPXV
SPXN vs. SPXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXN | SPXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.76 | 2.50 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 3.37 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.46 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.35 | 15.29 | +2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXN | SPXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.50 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.86 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SPXN vs. SPXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum SPXV drawdown of -34.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SPXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXN | SPXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -34.34% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -9.15% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.56% | -19.89% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.47% | -26.58% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.10% | -34.34% | +2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -4.52% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.07% | -0.06% |
Volatility
SPXN vs. SPXV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXN | SPXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.08% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 9.62% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 12.66% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.78% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.01% | -0.37% |
SPXN vs. SPXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPXN and SPXV have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXN vs. SPXV - Dividend Comparison
SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SPXV's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPXN and SPXV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXN has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SPXV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SPXV's -34.34%.
On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 16.47% vs 16.32% for SPXN. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 16.47% return vs 16.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXN and SPXV have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
SPXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.
SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXN and SPXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer