SPXN vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
SPXN and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXN is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Ex-Financials Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2015. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both SPXN and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPXN or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between SPXN and LIT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPXN vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPXN:
1.67
LIT:
0.07
SPXN:
2.26
LIT:
0.35
SPXN:
1.30
LIT:
1.04
SPXN:
2.44
LIT:
0.04
SPXN:
9.94
LIT:
0.18
SPXN:
2.26%
LIT:
13.08%
SPXN:
13.52%
LIT:
32.00%
SPXN:
-32.10%
LIT:
-62.61%
SPXN:
-0.19%
LIT:
-54.62%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXN having a 3.73% return and LIT slightly higher at 3.87%.
SPXN
3.73%
1.96%
8.78%
22.52%
14.78%
N/A
LIT
3.87%
0.19%
16.42%
-1.80%
5.57%
7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXN vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXN has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPXN vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPXN
LIT
SPXN vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPXN vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than LIT's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 1.07% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
SPXN vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPXN vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.67%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.