PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHV vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.25%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.


SCHV

1D
1.43%
1M
4.17%
YTD
18.75%
6M
17.40%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.25%

MGV

1D
1.49%
1M
4.52%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.46%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
18.75%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
17.55%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and MGV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.98

The correlation between SCHV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHV
MGV

Technology

22.5%
18.5%

Financial Services

18.6%
22.8%

Industrials

13.6%
13.2%

Healthcare

10.9%
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
3.4%

Energy

6.4%
6.0%

Utilities

4.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.2%

Technology

SCHV
22.5%
MGV
18.5%

Financial Services

SCHV
18.6%
MGV
22.8%

Industrials

SCHV
13.6%
MGV
13.2%

Healthcare

SCHV
10.9%
MGV
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHV
8.3%
MGV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHV
6.6%
MGV
3.4%

Energy

SCHV
6.4%
MGV
6.0%

Utilities

SCHV
4.2%
MGV
2.3%

Real Estate

SCHV
3.9%
MGV
1.2%

Basic Materials

SCHV
2.7%
MGV
2.3%

Communication Services

SCHV
2.4%
MGV
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHVMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.53

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

4.66

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.98

17.69

+0.29

SCHV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHVMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-56.07%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.42%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-13.18%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-16.54%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

-35.41%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-7.77%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.69%

+0.01%

Volatility

SCHV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.67%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHVMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.67%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

7.92%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

10.23%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

13.59%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.32%

+0.62%

SCHV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than MGV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SCHV and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to MGV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs MGV's -56.07%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.69% vs 12.25% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.75% for SCHV.

SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHV and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer