SCHV vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
SCHV and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both SCHV and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHV or SCHA.
Key characteristics
| SCHV | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.88% | 10.22% |
| 1Y Return | 28.97% | 27.83% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.02% | -0.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.84% | 9.28% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.98% | 8.93% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.94 | 1.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.09 | 2.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.10 | 1.21 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.01 | 9.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.68% | 3.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.28% | 19.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.08% | -42.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.00% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and SCHA is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHV vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 17.88% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 11.98%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHV vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHV and SCHA have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHV vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHV vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than SCHA's 2.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 3.19% | 4.68% | 4.55% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 5.66% | 3.05% | 3.55% | 6.75% | 6.81% | 4.85% | 5.39% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 2.11% | 2.56% | 1.37% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.01% | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.80% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHV vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 2.58%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.