PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.50%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


SCHV

1D
0.09%
1M
5.65%
YTD
15.39%
6M
16.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.50%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.39%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and VTV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.98

The correlation between SCHV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHV
VTV

Financial Services

19.6%
22.3%

Technology

18.2%
13.4%

Industrials

14.0%
14.0%

Healthcare

11.3%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
9.4%

Energy

7.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.0%

Utilities

4.6%
5.2%

Real Estate

4.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

SCHV
19.6%
VTV
22.3%

Technology

SCHV
18.2%
VTV
13.4%

Industrials

SCHV
14.0%
VTV
14.0%

Healthcare

SCHV
11.3%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHV
8.8%
VTV
9.4%

Energy

SCHV
7.2%
VTV
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHV
6.9%
VTV
4.0%

Utilities

SCHV
4.6%
VTV
5.2%

Real Estate

SCHV
4.1%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

SCHV
2.8%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

SCHV
2.5%
VTV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHVVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

2.61

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

3.74

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

4.15

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.96

15.69

+1.27

SCHV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHVVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.61

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.81

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.51

+0.21

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-59.27%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.35%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-14.52%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-17.04%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

-36.78%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-7.87%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.68%

+0.01%

Volatility

SCHV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

2.52%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

7.55%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

10.11%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

13.88%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.67%

+0.27%

SCHV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHV and VTV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SCHV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 11.50% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV and VTV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.

SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer