SCHV vs. AVLV
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SCHV is passively managed, while AVLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHV returned 19.00%/yr vs 22.67%/yr for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
SCHV vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.57% return.
SCHV
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
AVLV
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 16.92% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 8.15% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.57% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and AVLV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SCHV and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
AVLV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SCHV
AVLV
Financial Services
SCHV
AVLV
Industrials
SCHV
AVLV
Healthcare
SCHV
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
AVLV
Energy
SCHV
AVLV
Utilities
SCHV
AVLV
Real Estate
SCHV
AVLV
Basic Materials
SCHV
AVLV
Communication Services
SCHV
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
AVLV
SCHV vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.53 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 5.90 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 23.36 | -6.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -19.50% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -6.39% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -19.50% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.30% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.89% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.61% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.99%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 3.99% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 9.41% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 12.60% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 17.33% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 17.33% | -0.39% |
SCHV vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than AVLV's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.38% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.74% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SCHV and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to AVLV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 22.67% vs 19.00% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 22.67% return vs 19.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVLV.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.38% for AVLV.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.15% for AVLV.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer