QFIN vs. ATMP
QFIN (360 DigiTech, Inc.) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 5 years, QFIN returned -12.03%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QFIN vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QFIN achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return.
QFIN
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 17.56%
- YTD
- -15.31%
- 6M
- -17.62%
- 1Y
- -59.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
QFIN vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | -15.31% | -47.46% | 162.76% | -16.28% | -6.54% | 97.15% | 20.68% | -36.99% | -7.75% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFIN and ATMP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between QFIN and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFIN vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
QFIN
ATMP
QFIN vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFIN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.53 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 5.89 | -7.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFIN vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFIN drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFIN and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFIN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -80.86% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.31% | -7.30% | -65.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.15% | -16.48% | -56.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -22.98% | -53.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.51% | -5.61% | -58.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -31.08% | -14.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.01% | 3.13% | +49.88% |
Volatility
QFIN vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN) has a higher volatility of 29.45% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that QFIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFIN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.45% | 5.64% | +23.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.71% | 10.99% | +27.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.12% | 14.18% | +40.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.39% | 22.25% | +44.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.04% | 27.67% | +44.37% |
Dividends
QFIN vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
QFIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | 10.00% | 7.58% | 4.56% | 7.27% | 4.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFIN and ATMP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QFIN has higher volatility (29.45%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFIN dropped -76.74% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QFIN and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer