QFHD vs. UDIV
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - QFHD tracks the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index while UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for UDIV.
Performance
QFHD vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDIV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
QFHD vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.93% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and UDIV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UDIV
QFHD vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum UDIV drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and UDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -35.21% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -3.35% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -4.62% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 12.55% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 15.62% | -5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 16.30% | -5.85% |
QFHD vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than UDIV's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.12% | 1.53% | 2.05% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 3.40% | 3.74% | 3.47% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and UDIV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.12% for UDIV.
QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.06% for UDIV.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and UDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer