QFHD vs. DGRE
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DGRE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. QFHD is passively managed, while DGRE is actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.
Performance
QFHD vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRE
- 1D
- -5.99%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 26.43%
- 1Y
- 45.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
QFHD vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 17.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and DGRE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
DGRE
QFHD vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.29 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -36.95% | +31.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -7.82% | +6.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -12.00% | +9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 21.02% | -10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 18.31% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 19.73% | -9.36% |
QFHD vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than DGRE's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and DGRE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.27% for DGRE.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while DGRE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.32% for DGRE.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer