QFHD vs. DGRE
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. QFHD is passively managed, while DGRE is actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.
Performance
QFHD vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DGRE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 39.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $434.92K | $699.11K | $491.96K | |
| $11.21K | $32.42K | $25.69K |
QFHD vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 10.40% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 18.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and DGRE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRE
QFHD vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -36.95% | +31.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -8.69% | +7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -11.93% | +10.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 23.65% | -12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 18.95% | -8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 19.90% | -9.19% |
QFHD vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DGRE's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.34% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and DGRE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.30% for QFHD.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.32% for DGRE.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer