QFHD vs. CALF
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
QFHD vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.41M | $26.80M | $26.10M | |
| $11.21K | $32.42K | $25.69K |
QFHD vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 10.40% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and CALF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CALF
QFHD vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -47.58% | +42.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -2.88% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -10.60% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 15.85% | -5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 23.19% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 25.89% | -15.18% |
QFHD vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than CALF's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and CALF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.18% for CALF.
QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.59% for CALF.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer