PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFHD vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFHD vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFHD

1D
0.06%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
-1.90%
1M
3.49%
YTD
12.22%
6M
11.14%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFHD vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and CALF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFHD vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFHD

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFHD vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFHD vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFHDCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

0.37

+1.46

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFHDCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-47.58%

+42.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-2.92%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-10.73%

+8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

QFHD vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFHDCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

15.89%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

23.45%

-13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.37%

26.01%

-15.64%

QFHD vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFHD vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than CALF's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.22%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFHD and CALF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.22% for CALF.

QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.59% for CALF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFHD and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer