UDIV vs. SCHD
UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds - UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index while SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UDIV returned 11.75%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
UDIV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UDIV has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.75%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
UDIV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
UDIV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 13.99% | 19.00% | 25.61% | 25.21% | -15.00% | 19.66% | 5.54% | 24.60% | -8.83% | 17.44% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDIV and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UDIV and SCHD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UDIV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDIV
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
UDIV
SCHD
Financial Services
UDIV
SCHD
Communication Services
UDIV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
UDIV
SCHD
Healthcare
UDIV
SCHD
Industrials
UDIV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
UDIV
SCHD
Real Estate
UDIV
SCHD
-
Energy
UDIV
SCHD
Utilities
UDIV
SCHD
Basic Materials
UDIV
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDIV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
UDIV
SCHD
UDIV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDIV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 5.24 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.60 | 12.71 | +3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDIV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDIV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -33.37% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -4.61% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -16.13% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -16.85% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -33.37% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.86% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.31% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.90% | +0.01% |
Volatility
UDIV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDIV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.58% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 7.74% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 11.09% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 14.36% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.73% | -0.43% |
UDIV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UDIV and SCHD have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UDIV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.10% | 1.53% | 2.05% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 3.40% | 3.74% | 3.47% | 1.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDIV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 11.75% for UDIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDIV and SCHD have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.
UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab.
UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDIV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer