QFHD vs. FDL
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
QFHD vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.47M | $51.28M | $41.94M | |
| $11.21K | $32.42K | $25.69K |
QFHD vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 10.40% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and FDL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
QFHD vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -65.93% | +60.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.09% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -9.60% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 11.71% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 14.39% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 17.13% | -6.42% |
QFHD vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.65% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and FDL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.30% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer