QFHD vs. DVYA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DVYA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

QFHD vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFHD

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DVYA

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -5.74%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: 33.75%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: 6.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFHD vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	7.01%
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and DVYA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

QFHD vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVYA

DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 78
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFHD vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QFHD	DVYA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.82	0.29	+1.53

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and DVYA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFHD	DVYA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-45.61%	+40.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-6.03%	+4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-10.06%	+7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFHD	DVYA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	13.32%	-2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	15.13%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	17.57%	-7.20%

QFHD vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QFHD and DVYA have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

QFHD vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than DVYA's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF	4.46%	4.71%	5.97%	6.48%	7.29%	5.81%	3.66%	5.52%	6.24%	4.74%	4.79%	5.33%
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFHD and DVYA in my portfolio?

QFHD and DVYA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QFHD or DVYA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFHD or DVYA?

QFHD and DVYA have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFHD or DVYA?

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.

What is the main difference between QFHD and DVYA?

QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while DVYA is Asia Pacific Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares.