PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. HIDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than HIDV's 10.08% return.


UDIV

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.61%
YTD
13.99%
6M
13.60%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
11.75%

HIDV

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.64%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.99%19.00%25.61%19.93%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
10.08%14.64%26.01%20.30%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and HIDV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.96

The correlation between UDIV and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVHIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.82

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.60

12.12

+4.47

UDIV vs. HIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the HIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and HIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than HIDV's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and HIDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVHIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-18.76%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-9.57%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-18.76%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.74%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-2.05%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.22%

-0.31%

Volatility

UDIV vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) at 3.99%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVHIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.99%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.54%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

12.24%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

14.57%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

14.57%

+1.73%

UDIV vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDIV vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than HIDV's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.35%2.22%2.29%2.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.10%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, UDIV and HIDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to HIDV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs HIDV's -18.76%.

On 3-year performance, UDIV leads with 23.72% vs 21.10% for HIDV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 23.72% return vs 21.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.

UDIV is categorized as Dividend, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.45% for HIDV.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and HIDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer