UDIV vs. VYM
UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both Dividend funds - UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index while VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UDIV returned 11.75%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for VYM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UDIV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
UDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 11.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDIV having a 11.75% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 12.00%.
UDIV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
UDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 13.99% | 19.00% | 25.61% | 25.21% | -15.00% | 19.66% | 5.54% | 24.60% | -8.83% | 17.44% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.70% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDIV and VYM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between UDIV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDIV
VYM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
UDIV
VYM
Financial Services
UDIV
VYM
Communication Services
UDIV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
UDIV
VYM
Healthcare
UDIV
VYM
Industrials
UDIV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
UDIV
VYM
Real Estate
UDIV
VYM
Energy
UDIV
VYM
Utilities
UDIV
VYM
Basic Materials
UDIV
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
UDIV
VYM
UDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.79 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.60 | 14.09 | +2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -56.98% | +21.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -6.69% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -14.46% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -15.84% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -35.21% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -1.12% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -7.18% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.80% | +0.11% |
Volatility
UDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.02% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 7.64% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 10.41% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 13.93% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.35% | -0.05% |
UDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than VYM's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.10% | 1.53% | 2.05% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 3.40% | 3.74% | 3.47% | 1.63% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 11.75% for UDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.
UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.04% for VYM.
UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDIV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer