PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UDIV having a 13.87% return and VYM slightly higher at 14.21%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDIV having a 11.54% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.71%.


UDIV

1D
0.91%
1M
0.58%
6M
11.30%
YTD
13.87%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
11.74%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$516.03K$427.19K$922.08K
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

UDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.87%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and VYM is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.77

The correlation between UDIV and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDIV
VYM

Technology

40.3%
17.8%

Financial Services

11.4%
21.0%

Communication Services

10.1%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
6.8%

Healthcare

7.7%
13.2%

Industrials

6.0%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
8.1%

Real Estate

3.7%
0.0%

Energy

3.3%
8.6%

Utilities

2.7%
5.7%

Basic Materials

0.7%
3.3%

Technology

UDIV
40.3%
VYM
17.8%

Financial Services

UDIV
11.4%
VYM
21.0%

Communication Services

UDIV
10.1%
VYM
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UDIV
8.9%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

UDIV
7.7%
VYM
13.2%

Industrials

UDIV
6.0%
VYM
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

UDIV
5.4%
VYM
8.1%

Real Estate

UDIV
3.7%
VYM
0.0%

Energy

UDIV
3.3%
VYM
8.6%

Utilities

UDIV
2.7%
VYM
5.7%

Basic Materials

UDIV
0.7%
VYM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.56

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

13.40

-1.80

UDIV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-56.98%

+21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-6.69%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-14.46%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-15.84%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-35.21%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.15%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.14%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.78%

+0.27%

Volatility

UDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.46%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

7.42%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

10.29%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

13.87%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.29%

-0.12%

UDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.48%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.71% vs 11.54% for UDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.48% for UDIV.

UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer