PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 8.85% return. Over the past 10 years, UDIV has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 11.75%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.


UDIV

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.61%
YTD
13.99%
6M
13.60%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
11.75%

LVHD

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
8.85%
6M
8.57%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.99%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
8.85%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and LVHD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between UDIV and LVHD has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UDIV vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDIV
LVHD

Technology

40.3%
3.1%

Financial Services

11.3%
8.2%

Communication Services

10.2%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.4%

Healthcare

7.1%
4.4%

Industrials

5.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
21.8%

Real Estate

3.6%
15.4%

Energy

3.3%
7.4%

Utilities

3.1%
24.8%

Basic Materials

0.8%

-

Technology

UDIV
40.3%
LVHD
3.1%

Financial Services

UDIV
11.3%
LVHD
8.2%

Communication Services

UDIV
10.2%
LVHD
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UDIV
8.7%
LVHD
7.4%

Healthcare

UDIV
7.1%
LVHD
4.4%

Industrials

UDIV
5.9%
LVHD
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

UDIV
5.4%
LVHD
21.8%

Real Estate

UDIV
3.6%
LVHD
15.4%

Energy

UDIV
3.3%
LVHD
7.4%

Utilities

UDIV
3.1%
LVHD
24.8%

Basic Materials

UDIV
0.8%
LVHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.06

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.60

5.12

+11.47

UDIV vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-37.32%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-6.17%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-14.29%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-16.75%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-37.32%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.94%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.04%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.48%

-0.57%

Volatility

UDIV vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 3.76%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.76%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

7.11%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

9.88%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

12.90%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.53%

+0.77%

UDIV vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UDIV vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than LVHD's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.34%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.10%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDIV and LVHD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to LVHD (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, UDIV leads with 11.75% vs 8.19% for LVHD. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.

UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.27% for LVHD.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer