QFHD vs. RDIV
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
QFHD vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
QFHD vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and RDIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
RDIV
QFHD vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.55 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -49.97% | +44.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.77% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -5.86% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 13.21% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 17.53% | -7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 21.88% | -11.51% |
QFHD vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than RDIV's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.63% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and RDIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.39% for RDIV.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer