RDIV vs. VYM
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 10.90%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
RDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.90%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
RDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 12.46% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.70% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and VYM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between RDIV and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
VYM
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
VYM
Energy
RDIV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
VYM
Communication Services
RDIV
VYM
Real Estate
RDIV
VYM
Healthcare
RDIV
VYM
Technology
RDIV
VYM
Utilities
RDIV
VYM
Basic Materials
RDIV
VYM
Industrials
RDIV
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
VYM
RDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 3.79 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.39 | 14.09 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -56.98% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -6.69% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -14.46% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -15.84% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -35.21% | -14.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.12% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -7.18% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.80% | -0.12% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.02% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 7.64% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 10.41% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 13.93% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 16.35% | +5.55% |
RDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.77% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 10.90% for RDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer