QFHD vs. SCHD
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QFHD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.06K | $29.95K | $25.81K | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
QFHD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 11.66% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and SCHD is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
QFHD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -33.37% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -1.24% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -3.30% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 11.13% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 14.39% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 16.72% | -5.81% |
QFHD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHD is Dividend. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer