QFHD vs. SCHD
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds - QFHD tracks the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index while SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QFHD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
QFHD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 13.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and SCHD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
SCHD
QFHD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.86 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -33.37% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -1.61% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -3.32% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 10.98% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 14.38% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 16.72% | -6.35% |
QFHD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.
QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer