RDIV vs. VOO
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 10.90%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
RDIV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.90%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
RDIV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 12.46% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and VOO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and VOO has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RDIV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
VOO
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
VOO
Energy
RDIV
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
VOO
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
VOO
Communication Services
RDIV
VOO
Real Estate
RDIV
VOO
Healthcare
RDIV
VOO
Technology
RDIV
VOO
Utilities
RDIV
VOO
Basic Materials
RDIV
VOO
Industrials
RDIV
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
VOO
RDIV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 3.02 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.39 | 13.58 | +2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -33.99% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -8.90% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -18.69% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -24.52% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -33.99% | -15.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.74% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -3.68% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.98% | -0.30% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.60% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 9.73% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 12.39% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.90% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.05% | +3.85% |
RDIV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.77% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and VOO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to RDIV (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 10.90% for RDIV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer