RDIV vs. AFK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK).
RDIV and AFK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDIV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2013. AFK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2008. Both RDIV and AFK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RDIV or AFK.
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and AFK is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RDIV vs. AFK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RDIV:
0.38
AFK:
0.82
RDIV:
0.63
AFK:
1.25
RDIV:
1.09
AFK:
1.16
RDIV:
0.38
AFK:
0.44
RDIV:
1.34
AFK:
4.06
RDIV:
5.09%
AFK:
5.03%
RDIV:
18.06%
AFK:
24.94%
RDIV:
-49.97%
AFK:
-62.45%
RDIV:
-11.84%
AFK:
-34.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than AFK's 14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed AFK with an annualized return of 8.51%, while AFK has yielded a comparatively lower -1.23% annualized return.
RDIV
-4.56%
-5.53%
-6.34%
7.43%
16.24%
8.51%
AFK
14.41%
0.85%
5.04%
18.47%
6.93%
-1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDIV vs. AFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AFK's 0.78% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RDIV vs. AFK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RDIV
AFK
RDIV vs. AFK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RDIV vs. AFK - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while AFK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 4.31% | 4.07% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.32% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.49% | 3.36% |
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.28% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. AFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum AFK drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and AFK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RDIV vs. AFK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 12.55%, while VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.