PUMP vs. EQT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PUMP in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, EQT in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 5 years, PUMP returned 7.73%/yr vs 22.28%/yr for EQT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PUMP vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 72.24% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 2.59% return.

PUMP

• 1D: 6.78%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 72.24%
• 6M: 67.83%
• 1Y: 202.21%
• 3Y*: 29.69%
• 5Y*: 7.73%
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -6.52%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: -6.16%
• 1Y: -2.36%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 22.28%
• 10Y*: 4.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUMP vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp.	72.24%	1.93%	11.34%	-19.19%	28.02%	9.61%	-34.31%	-8.69%	-38.89%	39.03%
EQT EQT Corporation	2.59%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PUMP and EQT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between PUMP and EQT has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PUMP : $1.92B EQT : $34.18B
EPS PUMP : -$0.22 EQT : $5.40
PS Ratio PUMP : 1.94 EQT : 3.38
PB Ratio PUMP : 1.94 EQT : 1.36
Total Revenue (TTM) PUMP : $909.74M EQT : $10.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) PUMP : $79.21M EQT : $6.43B
EBITDA (TTM) PUMP : $158.47M EQT : $7.48B

Return for Risk

PUMP vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUMP

PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 92
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 36
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUMP vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUMP	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	-0.07	+2.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	0.12	+3.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.02	+0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.21	0.02	+6.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	0.03	+14.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUMP vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUMP and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUMP	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	-0.07	+2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.52	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.30	-0.28

Drawdowns

PUMP vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUMP	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.88%	-91.51%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.74%	-19.28%	-13.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.13%	-31.62%	-27.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.15%	-42.56%	-29.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.58%	-19.28%	-14.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.09%	-23.34%	-28.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.43%	10.81%	+3.62%

Volatility

PUMP vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) has a higher volatility of 16.35% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 7.75%. This indicates that PUMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUMP	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.35%	7.75%	+8.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.61%	21.76%	+17.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.91%	32.65%	+46.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.11%	42.80%	+19.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.99%	48.93%	+22.06%

Dividends

PUMP vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

PUMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQT EQT Corporation	1.19%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUMP and EQT in my portfolio?

PUMP and EQT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUMP or EQT?

PUMP has higher volatility (16.35%) compared to EQT (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs EQT's -91.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.