PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUMP vs. TSEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUMP vs. TSEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly lower than TSEM's 87.08% return.


PUMP

1D
2.59%
1M
-8.19%
6M
-3.39%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
118.93%
3Y*
1.58%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.16%

TSEM

1D
4.03%
1M
0.28%
6M
63.04%
YTD
87.08%
1Y
391.76%
3Y*
79.58%
5Y*
51.14%
10Y*
32.18%
ALL TIME*
0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$67.48M$58.46M$81.63M
$339.52M$421.97M$502.55M

PUMP vs. TSEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
16.72%1.93%11.34%-19.19%28.02%9.61%-34.31%-8.69%-38.89%34.40%
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor Ltd
87.08%127.96%68.77%-29.35%8.87%53.68%7.32%63.23%-56.75%49.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PUMP and TSEM is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2017

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PUMP:

$1.36B

TSEM:

$24.55B

EPS

PUMP:

-$0.12

TSEM:

$2.15

PS Ratio

PUMP:

1.08

TSEM:

15.46

PB Ratio

PUMP:

1.42

TSEM:

8.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUMP:

$1.16B

TSEM:

$1.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUMP:

$96.27M

TSEM:

$401.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

PUMP:

$162.15M

TSEM:

$571.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUMP vs. TSEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUMP
PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEM
TSEM Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TSEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUMP vs. TSEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUMPTSEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

9.41

-6.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

33.95

-25.86

PUMP vs. TSEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the TSEM Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUMP and TSEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUMP vs. TSEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, smaller than the maximum TSEM drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and TSEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUMPTSEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-99.75%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.90%

-40.72%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.13%

-45.83%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.15%

-55.39%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.99%

-63.28%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.07%

-85.27%

+33.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.47%

11.26%

+2.21%

Volatility

PUMP vs. TSEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is 21.59%, while Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) has a volatility of 30.62%. This indicates that PUMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUMPTSEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.59%

30.62%

-9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

65.57%

-22.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.84%

76.83%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.13%

49.90%

+12.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.91%

45.00%

+25.91%

Dividends

PUMP vs. TSEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PUMP nor TSEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PUMP vs. TSEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PUMP vs. TSEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PUMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ProPetro Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 28.36M and revenue of 305.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

TSEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.95M and revenue of 413.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

PUMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ProPetro Holding Corp. reported an operating income of -4.77M and revenue of 305.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

TSEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported an operating income of 64.57M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

PUMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ProPetro Holding Corp. reported a net income of -8.11M and revenue of 305.81M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

TSEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a net income of 65.03M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PUMP and TSEM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEM has higher volatility (30.62%) compared to PUMP (21.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs TSEM's -99.75%.

TSEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUMP and TSEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer