PUMP vs. TSEM
PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) and TSEM (Tower Semiconductor Ltd) are both stocks. PUMP operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while TSEM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PUMP returned 7.52%/yr vs 58.06%/yr for TSEM. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PUMP vs. TSEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 71.82% return, which is significantly lower than TSEM's 128.16% return.
PUMP
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 71.82%
- 6M
- 55.62%
- 1Y
- 176.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
TSEM
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 24.57%
- YTD
- 128.16%
- 6M
- 130.94%
- 1Y
- 561.18%
- 3Y*
- 91.15%
- 5Y*
- 58.06%
- 10Y*
- 35.28%
PUMP vs. TSEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 71.82% | 1.93% | 11.34% | -19.19% | 28.02% | 9.61% | -34.31% | -8.69% | -38.89% | 39.03% |
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | 128.16% | 127.96% | 68.77% | -29.35% | 8.87% | 53.68% | 7.32% | 63.23% | -56.75% | 48.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUMP and TSEM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between PUMP and TSEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PUMP:
$1.91B
TSEM:
$30.63B
PUMP:
-$0.22
TSEM:
$2.15
PUMP:
1.94
TSEM:
18.82
PUMP:
1.93
TSEM:
10.30
PUMP:
$909.74M
TSEM:
$1.62B
PUMP:
$79.21M
TSEM:
$401.63M
PUMP:
$158.47M
TSEM:
$571.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUMP vs. TSEM — Risk / Return Rank
PUMP
TSEM
PUMP vs. TSEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUMP | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.77 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 22.61 | -17.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 83.13 | -70.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUMP | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 8.44 | -6.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 1.25 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PUMP vs. TSEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, smaller than the maximum TSEM drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and TSEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUMP | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -99.75% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.74% | -25.04% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.13% | -46.78% | -12.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.15% | -55.39% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.74% | -55.21% | +21.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -85.42% | +33.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.45% | 6.80% | +7.65% |
Volatility
PUMP vs. TSEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is 16.28%, while Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) has a volatility of 29.90%. This indicates that PUMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUMP | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 29.90% | -13.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.59% | 53.71% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.91% | 67.10% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.11% | 46.78% | +15.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.97% | 43.33% | +27.64% |
Dividends
PUMP vs. TSEM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PUMP nor TSEM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PUMP vs. TSEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PUMP and TSEM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSEM has higher volatility (29.90%) compared to PUMP (16.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs TSEM's -99.75%.
TSEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PUMP and TSEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer