PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUMP vs. KRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUMP vs. KRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 71.82% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's -3.78% return.


PUMP

1D
-0.24%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
71.82%
6M
55.62%
1Y
176.48%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*

KRC

1D
0.97%
1M
7.07%
YTD
-3.78%
6M
-11.39%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
-8.47%
10Y*
-1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUMP vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
71.82%1.93%11.34%-19.19%28.02%9.61%-34.31%-8.69%-38.89%39.03%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
-3.78%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%19.30%-29.18%36.76%-13.54%4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PUMP and KRC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.26

The correlation between PUMP and KRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PUMP:

-$0.22

KRC:

$2.32

PS Ratio

PUMP:

1.94

KRC:

3.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUMP:

$909.74M

KRC:

$1.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUMP:

$79.21M

KRC:

$745.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

PUMP:

$158.47M

KRC:

$808.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUMP vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUMP
PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUMP vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUMPKRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.10

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

0.37

+5.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

0.79

+11.48

PUMP vs. KRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the KRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUMP and KRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUMPKRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

0.48

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.25

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.19

-0.17

Drawdowns

PUMP vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than KRC's maximum drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and KRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUMPKRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-81.27%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.74%

-35.32%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.13%

-35.32%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.15%

-64.91%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.74%

-45.41%

+11.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-23.41%

-28.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.45%

16.57%

-2.12%

Volatility

PUMP vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) at 7.97%. This indicates that PUMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUMPKRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.28%

7.97%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.59%

21.95%

+17.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.91%

27.60%

+51.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.11%

33.89%

+28.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.97%

31.55%

+39.42%

Dividends

PUMP vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison

PUMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
6.12%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PUMP vs. KRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M202220232024202520260
272.22M
(PUMP) Total Revenue
(KRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PUMP and KRC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUMP has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to KRC (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs KRC's -81.27%.

PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUMP and KRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer