PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUMP vs. KRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUMP vs. KRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's 7.42% return.


PUMP

1D
2.59%
1M
-8.19%
6M
-3.39%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
118.93%
3Y*
1.58%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.16%

KRC

1D
-1.82%
1M
-1.27%
6M
16.42%
YTD
7.42%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
-5.86%
10Y*
-1.76%
ALL TIME*
6.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.04M$52.15M$57.02M
$67.48M$58.46M$81.63M

PUMP vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
16.72%1.93%11.34%-19.19%28.02%9.61%-34.31%-8.69%-38.89%34.40%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
7.42%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%19.30%-29.18%36.76%-13.54%5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PUMP and KRC is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2017

0.25

The correlation between PUMP and KRC shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PUMP:

$1.36B

KRC:

$4.52B

EPS

PUMP:

-$0.12

KRC:

$1.35

PS Ratio

PUMP:

1.08

KRC:

4.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUMP:

$1.16B

KRC:

$1.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUMP:

$96.27M

KRC:

$734.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

PUMP:

$162.15M

KRC:

$564.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUMP vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUMP
PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUMP vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUMPKRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.09

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.34

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

0.70

+7.39

PUMP vs. KRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the KRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUMP and KRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUMP vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than KRC's maximum drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and KRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUMPKRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-81.27%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.90%

-35.32%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.13%

-35.32%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.15%

-64.91%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.99%

-39.06%

-15.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.07%

-23.50%

-28.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.47%

16.93%

-3.46%

Volatility

PUMP vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) has a higher volatility of 21.59% compared to Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) at 6.27%. This indicates that PUMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUMPKRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.59%

6.27%

+15.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

23.18%

+20.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.84%

28.10%

+51.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.13%

34.06%

+28.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.91%

31.65%

+39.26%

Dividends

PUMP vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison

PUMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
5.56%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PUMP vs. KRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PUMP and KRC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUMP has higher volatility (21.59%) compared to KRC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs KRC's -81.27%.

PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUMP and KRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer