PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUMP vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUMP vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 38.59% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 179.46% return.


PUMP

1D
2.41%
1M
-15.02%
6M
39.92%
YTD
38.59%
1Y
101.53%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

INTC

1D
-6.12%
1M
-17.22%
6M
134.04%
YTD
179.46%
1Y
340.12%
3Y*
46.96%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
13.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUMP vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
38.59%1.93%11.34%-19.19%28.02%9.61%-34.31%-8.69%-38.89%34.40%
INTC
Intel Corporation
179.46%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PUMP and INTC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2017

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PUMP:

$1.62B

INTC:

$518.28B

EPS

PUMP:

-$0.22

INTC:

-$0.66

PS Ratio

PUMP:

1.58

INTC:

9.25

PB Ratio

PUMP:

1.56

INTC:

4.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUMP:

$909.74M

INTC:

$53.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUMP:

$79.21M

INTC:

$19.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

PUMP:

$158.47M

INTC:

$8.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUMP vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUMP
PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUMP vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUMPINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.52

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

12.77

-9.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

31.57

-24.47

PUMP vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUMP and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUMP vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than INTC's maximum drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUMPINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-82.25%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.57%

-26.83%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.13%

-63.80%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.15%

-65.04%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.55%

-26.83%

-19.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-36.62%

-15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.25%

10.83%

+4.42%

Volatility

PUMP vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is 17.30%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that PUMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUMPINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.30%

27.31%

-10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.38%

62.43%

-21.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.94%

76.83%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.03%

53.38%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.88%

44.81%

+26.07%

Dividends

PUMP vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PUMP nor INTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PUMP vs. INTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
13.58B
(PUMP) Total Revenue
(INTC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PUMP and INTC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to PUMP (17.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUMP and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer