PFE vs. ET
PFE (Pfizer Inc.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. PFE operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, PFE returned 2.11%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFE vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFE achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PFE has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 2.11%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
PFE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- -7.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 12.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
PFE vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFE Pfizer Inc. | 8.79% | 0.65% | -2.22% | -41.26% | -10.41% | 66.70% | 3.07% | -6.91% | 24.82% | 15.90% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFE and ET is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PFE and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PFE:
$150.21B
ET:
$65.93B
PFE:
$1.31
ET:
$1.36
PFE:
19.98
ET:
14.01
PFE:
2.36
ET:
0.76
PFE:
1.67
ET:
1.33
PFE:
$63.32B
ET:
$89.38B
PFE:
$43.91B
ET:
$20.48B
PFE:
$16.94B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFE vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
PFE
ET
PFE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.70 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFE and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.24% | -87.81% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -9.38% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.43% | -24.56% | -15.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.96% | -25.82% | -33.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | -72.82% | +13.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.68% | -6.47% | -39.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -25.72% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 4.65% | +1.05% |
Volatility
PFE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 5.08% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 12.03% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 16.13% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 24.86% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 34.99% | -11.10% |
Dividends
PFE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
PFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
PFE Pfizer Inc. | 6.56% | 6.91% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 3.92% | 3.68% | 3.12% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 3.47% |
Financials
PFE vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pfizer Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PFE vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
PFE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.72B and revenue of 14.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
PFE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
PFE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a net income of 2.69B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PFE and ET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ET has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to PFE (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFE dropped -69.24% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFE and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer