PBF vs. CROX
PBF (PBF Energy Inc.) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. PBF operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, PBF returned 8.57%/yr vs 28.24%/yr for CROX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBF vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a 56.73% return, which is significantly higher than CROX's 45.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 8.57%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.24% annualized return.
PBF
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 56.73%
- 6M
- 40.01%
- 1Y
- 104.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
CROX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 28.36%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 38.71%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 28.24%
PBF vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 56.73% | 6.75% | -37.99% | 9.97% | 215.81% | 82.68% | -77.12% | 0.16% | -4.93% | 33.64% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 45.83% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBF and CROX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between PBF and CROX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PBF:
$5.05B
CROX:
$6.32B
PBF:
$3.74
CROX:
-$1.94
PBF:
0.16
CROX:
1.65
PBF:
0.89
CROX:
4.43
PBF:
$30.17B
CROX:
$4.02B
PBF:
$127.70M
CROX:
$2.34B
PBF:
$812.40M
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBF vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
PBF
CROX
PBF vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBF | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.13 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 0.63 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 1.06 | +5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBF vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBF | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -98.74% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.86% | -32.54% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.04% | -54.04% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.04% | -73.86% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.51% | -75.18% | -16.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.86% | -30.94% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.87% | -61.29% | +23.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.77% | 19.16% | -3.39% |
Volatility
PBF vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 12.30%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBF | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 12.30% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.59% | 32.47% | +15.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.62% | 52.96% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 55.19% | +5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.23% | 56.00% | +11.23% |
Dividends
PBF vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 2.63% | 4.06% | 3.86% | 1.93% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 4.23% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 3.39% | 4.30% | 3.26% |
Financials
PBF vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBF vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
PBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.50M and revenue of 7.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
PBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 299.60M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
PBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of 198.30M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBF and CROX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBF has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to CROX (12.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBF dropped -91.51% vs CROX's -98.74%.
PBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBF and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer