PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. VIPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CROX vs. VIPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 57.73% return, which is significantly higher than VIPS's -8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed VIPS with an annualized return of 32.09%, while VIPS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.


CROX

1D
5.37%
1M
7.67%
6M
55.26%
YTD
57.73%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
32.09%
ALL TIME*
11.32%

VIPS

1D
1.37%
1M
17.27%
6M
-6.06%
YTD
-8.45%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
1.91%
ALL TIME*
26.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$151.35M$139.69M$141.20M
$22.10M$26.94M$35.70M

CROX vs. VIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
57.73%-21.92%17.26%-13.85%-15.43%104.63%49.58%61.24%105.54%84.26%
VIPS
Vipshop Holdings Limited
-8.45%36.31%-22.25%30.21%62.38%-70.12%98.38%159.52%-53.41%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and VIPS is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2012

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CROX:

$6.47B

VIPS:

$7.65B

EPS

CROX:

$11.49

VIPS:

CN¥14.96

PE Ratio

CROX:

11.74

VIPS:

7.01

PEG Ratio

CROX:

0.24

VIPS:

0.32

PS Ratio

CROX:

1.72

VIPS:

0.50

PB Ratio

CROX:

4.89

VIPS:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

CROX:

$4.05B

VIPS:

CN¥106.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CROX:

$2.33B

VIPS:

CN¥24.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

CROX:

$803.31M

VIPS:

CN¥9.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CROX vs. VIPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CROX
CROX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VIPS
VIPS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CROX vs. VIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CROXVIPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.20

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

0.37

+1.92

CROX vs. VIPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the VIPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and VIPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CROX vs. VIPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than VIPS's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and VIPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CROXVIPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.74%

-86.75%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.19%

-34.93%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.04%

-39.32%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.86%

-65.88%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-86.75%

+11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.30%

-62.19%

+36.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-48.55%

-12.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.03%

19.22%

-2.19%

Volatility

CROX vs. VIPS - Volatility Comparison

Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 13.52% compared to Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) at 5.76%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CROXVIPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.52%

5.76%

+7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

22.13%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.79%

32.74%

+21.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.32%

52.08%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.57%

55.32%

+0.25%

Dividends

CROX vs. VIPS - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM20252024
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIPS
Vipshop Holdings Limited
3.99%2.71%3.19%

Financials

CROX vs. VIPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Vipshop Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CROX vs. VIPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and Vipshop Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.71M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

VIPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 26.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 285.68M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.

VIPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 204.89M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

VIPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CROX and VIPS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CROX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to VIPS (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs VIPS's -86.75%.

CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CROX and VIPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer