PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBF vs. DVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PBF vs. DVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Devon Energy Corporation (DVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a 170.44% return, which is significantly higher than DVN's 24.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has outperformed DVN with an annualized return of 15.33%, while DVN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.


PBF

1D
-1.12%
1M
51.18%
6M
119.20%
YTD
170.44%
1Y
244.92%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
54.47%
10Y*
15.33%
ALL TIME*
10.53%

DVN

1D
2.17%
1M
11.51%
6M
13.62%
YTD
24.73%
1Y
44.06%
3Y*
-2.56%
5Y*
17.09%
10Y*
6.01%
ALL TIME*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$434.65M$476.05M$632.82M
$225.84M$191.30M$141.72M

PBF vs. DVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
170.44%6.75%-37.99%9.97%215.81%82.68%-77.12%0.16%-4.93%33.64%
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
24.73%15.03%-25.21%-23.08%50.86%199.88%-35.34%16.81%-45.09%-8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PBF and DVN is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012

0.47

The correlation between PBF and DVN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBF:

$8.55B

DVN:

$28.05B

EPS

PBF:

$11.31

DVN:

$5.12

PE Ratio

PBF:

6.39

DVN:

8.81

PEG Ratio

PBF:

0.02

DVN:

0.68

PS Ratio

PBF:

0.25

DVN:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBF:

$34.37B

DVN:

$12.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBF:

$1.54B

DVN:

$2.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

PBF:

$2.13B

DVN:

$5.67B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBF vs. DVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBF
PBF Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBF Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DVN
DVN Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBF vs. DVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Devon Energy Corporation (DVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBFDVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.21

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.67

1.79

+4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

4.46

+10.93

PBF vs. DVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBF Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the DVN Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBF and DVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBF vs. DVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum DVN drawdown of -94.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and DVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFDVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-94.93%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.86%

-22.15%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.04%

-49.22%

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.04%

-61.45%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.51%

-88.51%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-41.84%

+40.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.63%

-35.97%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.08%

8.86%

+6.22%

Volatility

PBF vs. DVN - Volatility Comparison

PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 20.64% compared to Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) at 10.06%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBFDVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.64%

10.06%

+10.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.06%

25.44%

+22.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.86%

33.90%

+31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.15%

40.72%

+19.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.63%

49.38%

+18.25%

Dividends

PBF vs. DVN - Dividend Comparison

PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than DVN's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
2.30%2.62%4.43%4.55%8.41%5.24%4.30%1.35%1.33%0.58%0.92%3.00%
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
1.52%4.06%3.86%1.93%0.49%0.00%4.23%3.83%3.67%3.39%4.30%3.26%

Financials

PBF vs. DVN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and Devon Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PBF vs. DVN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PBF Energy Inc. and Devon Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 11.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.8%.

DVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Devon Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 11.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

DVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Devon Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of 906.40M and revenue of 11.68B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

DVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Devon Energy Corporation reported a net income of 120.00K and revenue of 3.81M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PBF and DVN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBF has higher volatility (20.64%) compared to DVN (10.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBF dropped -91.51% vs DVN's -94.93%.

PBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBF and DVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer